Faculty of Law
Department of Mercantile Law
Research articles in refereed specialist journals
Lötz DJ: 2002. Ten Brink NO v Motala 2002 1 SA 1011 (D). De Jure, 35 (2) / Dec, pp 361-367.
Lötz DJ: 2002. Mia v DJL Properties (Waltloo) (Pty) Ltd 2000 4 SA 220 (T). De Jure, 35 (1) / Jul, pp 157-163.
Lombard S: 2002. 'n Historiese perspektief op die ontwikkeling van die maatskappy as ondernemingsvorm, met besondere verwysing na die posisie van maatskappyskuldeisers en die aanspreeklikheid van direkteure (deel 1). De Jure, 35 (2) / Dec, pp 236-252.
de Gama JJ: 2002. Forensic and scientific developments in genomics and the impact on criminal and legal investigations: DNA testing. De Jure, 35 (2) / Dec, pp 297-305.
de Villiers WP: 2002. The operation of the presumption of innocence and its role in bail proceedings under Canadian and South African law (1). De Jure, 35 (1) / Jul, pp 92-108.
de Villiers WP: 2002. The operation of the presumption of innocence and its role in bail proceedings under Canadian and South African law (2). De Jure, 35 (2) / Dec, pp 195-206.
Boraine A, Roestoff M: 2002. Fresh Start Procedures for Consumer Debtors in South African Bankruptcy Law. International Insolvency Review, (11), pp 1-11.
Nagel CJ: 2002. Omskepping van toonderdokument in orderdokument - Cutfin (Pty) Ltd v Sangio Pipe CC [2002] All SA 186 (D). Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, 65 (2) / May, pp 317-319.
van Eck BPS, Boraine A: 2002. Voluntary winding-up of a company and 'dismissals' in terms of the Labour Relations Act. Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, 65 (4) / Nov, pp 610-622.
Burdette DA, Delport PA: 2002. The noting of an appeal against a winding-up order: Suspension or continuation?. Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, 65 (4) / Nov, pp 632-637.
Louw C: 2002. Voordeel vir skuldeisers in geval van gedwonge sekwestrasie as gevolg van agterstallige heffings ingevolge die Wet op Deeltitels. Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, 65 (4) / Nov, pp 597-600.
Blignaut HM: 2002. Pharmaceutical tablet shapes as trade marks - Triomed (Pty) Ltd v Beecham Group plc. 2001 2 SA 522 (T). Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, 65 (4) / Nov, pp 665-669.
Renke S: 2002. Kredietooreenkomste - Paaiementsgewyse betaling van die deposito - Van der Westhuizen v BOE Bank Bpk 2002 1 SA 876(T). Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, 65 (3) / Aug, pp 493-496.
de Villiers WP: 2002. The admissibility at the subsequent criminal trial of evidence tendered by the accused for purposes of bail proceedings (1). Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, 65 (1) / Feb, pp 87-98.
de Villiers WP: 2002. The admissibility at the subsequent criminal trial of evidence tendered by the accused for purposes of bail proceedings (2). Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, 65 (2) / May, pp 203-222.
de Villiers WP: 2002. The onus of proof in bail proceedings under South African and Canadian law (1). Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, 65 (3) / Aug, pp 321-338.
de Villiers WP: 2002. The onus of proof in bail proceedings under South African and Canadian law (2). Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, 65 (4) / Nov, pp 497-513.
de Gama JJ, Links E: 2002. NEPAD: Objectives and implications for investment and trade. Journal of Public Administration (SAIPA/SAAPM), 37 (3.1) / Nov, pp 306-326.
Botha MM: 2002. The Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Illegal Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998. Obiter, 23 (2), pp 309-327.
Boraine A, van Eck BPS, Burdette DA: 2002. The Amendments to Sections 38 and 98A of the Insolvency Act and Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act. South African Insolvency Law Review, 1.
van Eck BPS: 2002. Latest developments regarding disciplinary enquiries. South African Journal of Labour Relations, 26 (3), pp 24-41.
|
